An employee bringing a retaliation claim under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-54 must prove that the retaliation was the but-for cause of termination. Lapham v. Walgreen Co., 2023 WL 8609244 (11th Cir. 2023). Doris Lapham, an employee of Walgreens for almost ten years, sought leave under FMLA so that…
Category: Employment Law and Employee Benefits
Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers Required to Allege Fraud
The Eleventh Circuit clarified the reasonable-belief standard for whistleblowers alleging unlawful retaliation under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, in Ronnie v. Office Depot, LLC, No. 20-14214, ___ F.4th ___ (11th Cir. Sept. 25, 2023). SOX broadly prohibits discrimination against employees for providing information that they “reasonably believe[] constitutes” mail, wire, bank, or securities fraud (or a violation of…
No Special Tolling for Plaintiff Who Brings an Untimely FLSA Action After Previous Timely Action Is Dismissed
The Fair Labor Standards Act’s statute of limitations is not tolled when a plaintiff files an FLSA action that is later dismissed and then files a new, untimely, action. This was the court’s holding in Wright v. Waste Pro USA, Inc., 696 F.4th 1332 (June 13, 2023), which also rejected the plaintiff’s request for equitable…
ERISA Beneficiary May Recover as “Appropriate Equitable Relief” Benefits Lost Due to Fiduciary’s Breach
The Eleventh Circuit has joined every other Court of Appeals to consider the issue by holding that an ERISA beneficiary may recover under ERISA’s Section 1132(a)(3), which permits an action for “appropriate equitable relief,” benefits lost as a result of a breach of fiduciary duty. Gimeno v. NCHMD, Inc., 38 F.4th 910 (11th Cir. June…
“Business Development Managers” Fall Under FLSA Administrative Exemption, Not Entitled to Overtime
In Brown v. Nexus Business Solutions, LLC, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8777 (11th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022), the Eleventh Circuit held that “business development managers,” tasked with persuading corporate customers to purchase General Motors vehicles for their fleets, are not entitled to overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The business development managers…
Restaurant’s Mandatory Service Charge is Not a “Tip” Under FLSA
Tipped employees at Miami’s Nusr-et Steakhouse sued their employer, alleging that the restaurant violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by counting payments to employees from the restaurant’s mandatory 18% “service charge” as part of the employees’ “regular rate of pay,” rather than as tips. The district court rejected the employees’ claim and granted the restaurant’s…
Court Vacates Preliminary Injunction Enforcing Non-Disclosure Covenant Where Former Employer Did Not Allege Any Prior Violation and Did Not Establish a Legitimate Business Interest in Customer Relationships
In an appeal of a preliminary injunction, the Eleventh Circuit dismissed part of the appeal as moot while vacating the remaining provisions of the preliminary injunction. Vital Pharm., Inc. v. Alfieri, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 1771 (11th Cir. Jan. 20, 2022). Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. brought suit against four former employees and a competitor based on…
Court Affirms Summary Judgment in Employer’s Favor on ERISA Claims Arising from Discontinuation of Life Insurance
In Klaas v. Allstate Insurance Co., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 38473 (11th Cir. Dec. 28, 2021), the Eleventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment in the employer’s favor on ERISA claims stemming from the employer’s discontinuation of retirees’ life insurance benefits. Until 2013, Allstate provided eligible Allstate employees with life insurance that continued after the employee’s retirement….
Dual Jobs and Dueling Opinions: Divided Panel Reverses Summary Judgment in Employer’s Favor in FLSA Case
A divided panel of the Eleventh Circuit reversed summary judgment for the employer on an employee’s Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) claims in Rafferty v. Denny’s, Inc., 13 F.4th 1166 (11th Cir. 2021). Lindsay Rafferty, who had been a Denny’s server, claimed that the restaurant violated the FLSA in paying her sub-minimum wage for time…
ERISA’s Fee-Shifting Provision Permits Awards Against Parties, Not Attorneys
Does ERISA’s fee-shifting provision, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(1), permit a court to award fees against a party’s counsel? Deciding this issue of first impression that has divided district courts within and without the Eleventh Circuit, the court in Peer v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston, 2021 WL 1257440 (11th Cir. Apr. 6, 2021), held…