The Eleventh Circuit upheld a district court’s rejection of a doctor’s libel and false advertising action challenging two articles highly critical of his novel medical treatments. In Edward Lewis Tobinick, MD v. Novella, 2017 WL 603832 (11th Cir. Feb. 15, 2017), the court upheld the district court’s orders striking state-law claims pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute,…
Author: Wendy Spiro
Securities Law Judgment Excepted from Discharge
On the same day the court decided Appling (below), the Eleventh Circuit issued a second bankruptcy-discharge opinion, this time addressing one of the more obscure exceptions from discharge, § 523(a)(19)(A)’s exception for judgments for securities law violations. Lunsford v. Process Technologies Services, LLC (In re Lunsford), 2017 WL 603845 (11th Cir. Feb. 15, 2017). Judge…
Court Broadly Construes Bankruptcy Discharge Exception for Fraud
One of the most litigated issues in bankruptcy court is whether a discharge of a particular claim should be granted to a debtor who has committed fraud relating to the claim, a statutory discharge exception found in section 523(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Bankruptcy Code. The statute establishes a dichotomy between fraudulent statements regarding the…
Insurer Liable for Intoxicated Employee’s Accident Under General Permissive Use Clause
An employee may be covered by an employer’s auto insurance policy as a permissive user even though the employee violates a company policy prohibiting driving while intoxicated. The Eleventh Circuit, in Great American Alliance Insurance Co. v. Anderson, 2017 WL 521560 (11th Cir. Feb. 8, 2017), assessed conflicting cases under Georgia law, but determined that a general permissive…
Federal Common Law Applies State Preclusion Rules to Judgments in Diversity Cases
The Eleventh Circuit cleaned up some conflicting precedent this week and confirmed that state-law rules determine the preclusive effect of judgments rendered by federal courts in diversity cases. In deciding that question in CSX Transportation, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc., 2017 WL 393704 (11th Cir. Jan. 30, 2017), the court reversed the district court’s judgment…
Health Savings Accounts not exempt from bankruptcy estate in Georgia
After the Georgia Supreme Court answered a certified question, the Eleventh Circuit held that health savings account (“HSA”) funds are not property exempt from the bankruptcy estate under Georgia law. In Mooney v. Webster, No. 15-11229 (11th Cir. Jan. 27, 2017), a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petitioner claimed the assets in her HSA account as exempt…
Florida STOLI policies have insurable interest
In consolidated Pruco Life Insurance Co. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2017 WL 360512 (11th Cir. Jan. 25, 2017), the Eleventh Circuit applied guidance from the Florida Supreme Court and held that Stranger-Originated Life Insurance (“STOLI”) policies have an “insurable interest” as required by Florida Statute § 627.404, so a standard contractual provision limiting challenges…
Fee Awards – Maybe an Art; Not a Science
In Yellow Pages Photos, Inc. v. Ziplocal, LP, 2017 WL 343520 (11th Cir. Jan. 24, 2017), the Eleventh Circuit reversed a district court’s decision to use a mathematical formula to award costs and fees in proportion to the degree of success in litigation of the underlying claims. Yellow Pages Photos, Inc. (“YPPI”) and Ziplocal entered…
Patronage Capital Class Action Removable; Dismissal Affirmed
An electric cooperative organized under state law is nonetheless entitled to remove a putative class action to federal court under the “federal officer” removal statute, according to the Eleventh Circuit in Caver v. Central Alabama Electric Cooperative, 845 F.3d 1135 (11th Cir. 2017), which also affirmed dismissal of a complaint seeking immediate return of patronage capital. Specifically,…
Kardashians Left Blushing, Can’t Compel Arbitration in Makeup Case
Kimberly, Kourtney, and Khloe Kardashian will find themselves back in court after the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the denial of their motion to compel arbitration in Kroma Makeup EU, LLC v. Boldface Licensing + Branding, Inc., No. 15-15060 (11th Cir. Jan. 18, 2017). The Kardashians sought to enforce an arbitration clause against a party to the underlying contract…